Latest News

In today’s civil construction and infrastructure environment, hiring decisions carry more weight than ever. Projects are under pressure from tight timelines, cost escalation, labour shortages and increasing compliance expectations. While most hiring conversations focus on speed and availability, the real risk often sits elsewhere: the cost of getting it wrong.  A bad hire in civil construction doesn’t just affect headcount. It impacts productivity, site safety, morale, and ultimately, delivery. And in a market where skilled labour is already scarce, the consequences can compound quickly. ‎ ‎ Why the risk is rising According to commentary from civil construction cost consultancy Rider Levett Bucknall (RLB), Australia’s infrastructure sector is operating in a high-pressure environment, shaped by labour scarcity and sustained project demand. Even as some material costs stabilise, workforce constraints continue to place pressure on delivery timelines and operating margins.  When labour is hard to secure, the temptation to prioritise speed over suitability increases. That’s where the hidden costs begin.  You can read more on RLB’s outlook for the civil construction sector via their Asia-Pacific insights hub. ‎ ‎ ‎  The productivity impact no one budgets for On paper, a bad hire might look like a short-term inconvenience. In reality, it often creates a ripple effect across the site.  Workers who are under-qualified, unfamiliar with live environments, or poorly briefed can slow down crews, require rework, or place extra strain on supervisors who must step in to manage issues. Productivity drops, even if headcount technically increases.  Downtime caused by poor performance, missed competencies or early exits is rarely tracked as a direct recruitment cost. But when critical path activities are delayed, the financial impact can escalate quickly. ‎ ‎ Safety incidents are not just a compliance issue Safety is one of the most significant hidden costs of a poor hiring decision.  Workers…

Across NSW and Victoria, major infrastructure investment is accelerating at a rate unmatched by workforce growth. Rail expansions, tunnelling corridors and large-scale road projects are placing unprecedented strain on the supply of specialist electricians, and the downstream impacts on labour-hire cost, project scheduling and workforce strategy are now strategic risks. ‎ ‎  Infrastructure Is Expanding – But the Talent Pipeline Isn’t Australia is already grappling with a structural shortage of electricians—recent industry commentary flags a national requirement for up to 42,000 additional electricians to meet demand. On the infrastructure side, a further labour-supply alarm is sounded by a recent report which projects that NSW’s $1.14 trillion public infrastructure pipeline could see a workforce shortfall of 300,000 workers by 2027 – with transport, tunnelling and civil-works trades heavily implicated.   In short: the infrastructure megaprojects in NSW and VIC are proceeding full throttle but the trades, including electricians, are the bottleneck. ‎ ‎  Why Infrastructure Electricians Are Now a Premium Resource Infrastructure workplaces demand far more than general wiring and installation. Roles now demand experience in:  Rail signalling, low/high voltage rail systems and electrotechnology in metro and tunnel environments  Tunnelling site power distribution, lighting & temporary works, plus safety systems for underground works  Road infrastructure electrical works (traffic management systems, intelligent transport systems, large-scale lighting, shutdowns)  Commissioning, live-site fault diagnostics and high-voltage/low-voltage integration in heavy infrastructure contexts  Because these roles are highly specialised (and because the pool of licenced electricians with this kind of experience is shrinking) demand is exceeding supply. Rail and Transmission in particular are moving through a fast pace of change with unprecedented investment in network infrastructure via upgrades and new builds resulting in skills shortages of overhead line workers.  Put simply: infrastructure electricians are rare, in demand, and commanding a premium. ‎ ‎ ‎  NSW & VIC: The…

Australia is in the midst of a once-in-a-generation infrastructure boom. But ambitious pipelines of roads, rail, energy and utilities projects are bumping against a hard reality: a deep and growing infrastructure skills gap. In fact, recent forecasts suggest that we will need 197,000 additional infrastructure workers to meet demand in 2025. ‎ ‎ The scale of the shortfall: what’s driving the 197,000-worker gap? According to the 2024 Infrastructure Market Capacity Report, the skills and labour shortage in Australia’s infrastructure sector remains one of the top capacity constraints.   A related industry commentary quantifies that shortfall as 197,000 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions across key infrastructure roles, ranging from tradespeople and labourers through to engineers and project managers.   That 197,000 figure is not arbitrary. It is derived from overlaying projected demand (driven by government and private infrastructure investment) against expected workforce supply (through training, migration, retention, and internal upskilling).   Breaking it down:  Trades & Labourers: Around 57,000 roles are expected to be in shortage (about 29 % of the total shortfall).  Engineers, Scientists & Architects: The single largest area of shortage (~111,000 roles, or ~56 % of the total)   Project Management Professionals: ~29,000 roles (15 %)   This isn’t just a future risk, these pressures are already being felt. Infrastructure Australia’s workforce supply dashboards show widespread shortages across dozens of relevant occupational categories.   Contributing factors:  An ageing workforce, with many skilled workers approaching retirement.   Constraints in migration: while migration helps, it cannot fully plug gaps in skills, especially for senior or regionally located roles.   Bottlenecks in education and training, and leakage from vocational pathways.   Geographic mismatches: many infrastructure projects are regionally based, making attraction and retention of skilled workers harder outside metro areas.   Competition with adjacent sectors (mining, energy, resources) for the same talent pools.   ‎ ‎  Why hiring managers should make this a…